Return to Field Notes
FIELD NOTE 001Decision Criteria
001MONOGRAPH DISPATCH

“Customers don’t choose businesses. They eliminate them.”

Published: February 12, 2026
Industry: Gadget & Consumer Electronics
Read Time: 6 min read
Lead: Hephzibah
EPISTEMIC CLASSIFICATIONVERIFIED FRAMEWORK
Observation

Customers abandon vendors within 45 seconds upon encountering ambiguous information.

Interpretation

Customers prioritize self-protection against deceit over marginal price savings.

Hypothesis

Elimination criteria are standardized across Nigerian urban buyers and operate prior to price comparison.

Conclusion

A business must optimize to survive the elimination filter before marketing its superior value proposition.

01 · MAIN OBSERVATION

What was observed in the field

Consumers in competitive retail markets do not evaluate every alternative equally. They maintain a mental checklist of disqualifiers. The business they eventually buy from is rarely the "best" in the market—it is simply the last credible contender standing.

02 · CONTEXT & ENVIRONMENT

Where and how this occurred

Observed across 47 consumer interactions in Computer Village (Ikeja) and 82 direct messaging logs with independent gadget merchants across Lagos and Abuja.

03 · WHAT BUSINESSES INITIALLY THOUGHT

The Conventional Assumption

Vendors believed customers spend days comparing spec sheets, warranty clauses, and searching for the absolute cheapest vendor before buying.

04 · WHAT CHANGED OUR THINKING

The Field Reality

When recording the sequence of customer actions, we noticed that 74% of candidate stores were rejected in less than 45 seconds—not because of price, but because of poor response tone, lack of physical verification address, or ambiguous condition labels ("UK used" without grade specifics).

05 · EVIDENCE & EXAMPLESUNREDACTED FIELD LOGS
[field_log]Ikeja Computer Village Observation Log #14

A buyer approached four consecutive stalls asking for a MacBook Pro M2. Stall 1 said "Oga enter inside first." Buyer walked away. Stall 2 gave a price ₦50k higher than average. Buyer walked away without bargaining. Stall 3 showed the machine immediately, let him inspect the battery health in daylight, and stated the warranty without hedging. Sale completed within 7 minutes.

[interview]Buyer Transcript (Female, 29, Product Designer)

"I am not looking for the cheapest vendor on Instagram. I am looking for the vendor who won't give me high blood pressure. If I ask for the price and you say 'Check DM', you are eliminated. If your bio says 'We deliver nationwide' but no street address, eliminated."

[commercial_flow]Instagram DM Funnel Audit

Vendors who answered "How much?" with an immediate breakdown of price, warranty, and pick-up location converted 3.8x more buyers than vendors who sent generic welcome greetings.

06 · CURRENT WORKING HYPOTHESIS

The Operative Model

“In environments with low institutional contract enforcement, buying is primarily a risk minimization exercise rather than a value maximization exercise.”

07 · EPISTEMIC FRONTIERSUNRESOLVED QUESTIONS

What we still don’t know

A serious research organization documents where its certainty ends. We are actively investigating:

  • ?At what financial threshold does price discount override high elimination risk?
  • ?How does peer referral alter the threshold of elimination tolerance?
Cite: ITẸ Research Archive · Field Note 001
Cross-Referenced Observations

Related Field Notes